Fresno State’s move to the Mountain West Conference now appears to be a lateral move

By | December 12, 2011 | Blog, Sports (4)

When Fresno State first left the Western Athletic Conference (WAC) for the Mountain West Conference (MWC) it was looked at as a huge step forward for the program. The Bulldogs would finally be able to be in a conference that had a shot at an automatic BCS bowl bid. Fast-forward a year later and a lot has changed for the conference.

Last year the MWC was beaming with pride when it looked as though they would be an extremely competitive conference but in the last year they have had to watch as Boise State, San Diego State and TCU left for the Big12 and Big East. That’s not even counting the departures of Utah to the Pac12 and BYU to independent status before the season began.

This makes the biggest additions to the conference Nevada and Hawaii. Hardly something to be excited about considering they both left the WAC with the Bulldogs. The remainder of the MWC will consist of Wyoming, UNLV, New Mexico, Colorado State and Air Force. Hardly the big boys the Bulldogs thought they’d be playing with when they elected to switch conferences.

Wyoming and Air Force were also the only two remaining teams from this last season’s MWC that finished with winning records. Wyoming won eight games, while Air Force won seven. UNLV, New Mexico and Colorado State on the other hand were among some of the worst teams in the country winning a combined six games.

These facts make one ponder was the move to another conference really worth it? Are Wyoming, Air Force, UNLV, New Mexico, and Colorado State that much better than Utah State, Idaho, San Jose State, New Mexico State and Louisiana Tech? The answer is an emphatic no. They are not that much better than the aforementioned teams.

At this point the move may have even hurt the Bulldogs. In 2010 the Bulldogs were forced by WAC Commissioner Karl Benson to pay a $5 million fee and to wait until 2012 to join the MWC. The Bulldogs were forced to pay the fee due to the members of the WAC signing a buyout pact stating that any member looking to leave the conference would have to pay the fee and wait. A week after signing the loyalty pact the Bulldogs accepted the MWC’s invitation.

This essentially means that they paid $5 million to join a conference that is now no better than the one it left. Basically, the university wasted money just to have a different conference logo on their uniforms. This hurts even more considering the fact that the Athletic Department is hurting as it is.

When one makes a risky move the purpose of the move is to advance one’s self. In this case the Bulldogs made a lateral move, if not a step back.

A verified e-mail address is required to post a comment.Views expressed in the comments section are not representative of The Collegian unless so specified. Comments must be approved by a moderator before they are published. Comments that are inflammatory, profane, libellous and/or posted under a false name may be removed at the discretion of The Collegian. Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.

3 Responses to Fresno State’s move to the Mountain West Conference now appears to be a lateral move

  1. DHosep says:

    Wow, where did you get your information from because it is not even close to being accurate.
    The TV money alone is far better than the WAC. The teams are higher ranked nationally than those that we are leaving behind. If the merger of Conference USA with the MWC comes to past, this will make the conference even stronger yet. Sounds like you have a biased view and you are trying to justify it.

  2. JimmyB says:

    I gotta say that I agree with this article. This is not a step back, but certainly a lateral one. With everyone abandoning the MW you can be sure the TV money will leave as well. The WAC is now down to 1 post season bowl game. Now that nobody is left in the MW, I can’t imagine it not happening here too.

  3. pedro says:

    lateral seems about right…good call

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>