<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commish for a day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/</link>
	<description>Serving California State University, Fresno since 1922.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-40454</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-40454</guid>
		<description>Wow it&#039;s a good thing you&#039;re not commissioner. 

Your point against interleague is legit but an easy way to fix that problem is make sure that teams in each division play the same interleague opponents the same number of times.  That would be an easy fix to interleague play that would still allow teams with legit interleague rivals (ie. A&#039;s Giants, Dodgers Angles) to continue with these exciting mid-summer matchups that seem to draw a larger number of fans.  

Don&#039;t understand why you are against even limited instant replay in baseball which would allow plays to be reviewed to get calls right.  A fast review for plays like that foul ball call in the Angles Yankees series just seems to make to much sense.  How long would that really take for an umpire to radio down to the crew on the field and reverse that wrong call?

Finally, I don&#039;t see the problem of having division and the rivalries created by divisional play (i.e. Mets Braves, Giants Dodgers, Cubs Cardinals).  This is also a way to limit travel for the teams as they play a large number of road games closer to home within their division. 

As for the All-Star game I completely agree.  That game does not need to &quot;mean something&quot;.  It should be for the fans, which is why it was created in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow it&#8217;s a good thing you&#8217;re not commissioner. </p>
<p>Your point against interleague is legit but an easy way to fix that problem is make sure that teams in each division play the same interleague opponents the same number of times.  That would be an easy fix to interleague play that would still allow teams with legit interleague rivals (ie. A&#8217;s Giants, Dodgers Angles) to continue with these exciting mid-summer matchups that seem to draw a larger number of fans.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t understand why you are against even limited instant replay in baseball which would allow plays to be reviewed to get calls right.  A fast review for plays like that foul ball call in the Angles Yankees series just seems to make to much sense.  How long would that really take for an umpire to radio down to the crew on the field and reverse that wrong call?</p>
<p>Finally, I don&#8217;t see the problem of having division and the rivalries created by divisional play (i.e. Mets Braves, Giants Dodgers, Cubs Cardinals).  This is also a way to limit travel for the teams as they play a large number of road games closer to home within their division. </p>
<p>As for the All-Star game I completely agree.  That game does not need to &#8220;mean something&#8221;.  It should be for the fans, which is why it was created in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-48522</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-48522</guid>
		<description>Wow it&#039;s a good thing you&#039;re not commissioner. 

Your point against interleague is legit but an easy way to fix that problem is make sure that teams in each division play the same interleague opponents the same number of times.  That would be an easy fix to interleague play that would still allow teams with legit interleague rivals (ie. A&#039;s Giants, Dodgers Angles) to continue with these exciting mid-summer matchups that seem to draw a larger number of fans.  

Don&#039;t understand why you are against even limited instant replay in baseball which would allow plays to be reviewed to get calls right.  A fast review for plays like that foul ball call in the Angles Yankees series just seems to make to much sense.  How long would that really take for an umpire to radio down to the crew on the field and reverse that wrong call?

Finally, I don&#039;t see the problem of having division and the rivalries created by divisional play (i.e. Mets Braves, Giants Dodgers, Cubs Cardinals).  This is also a way to limit travel for the teams as they play a large number of road games closer to home within their division. 

As for the All-Star game I completely agree.  That game does not need to &quot;mean something&quot;.  It should be for the fans, which is why it was created in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow it&#8217;s a good thing you&#8217;re not commissioner. </p>
<p>Your point against interleague is legit but an easy way to fix that problem is make sure that teams in each division play the same interleague opponents the same number of times.  That would be an easy fix to interleague play that would still allow teams with legit interleague rivals (ie. A&#8217;s Giants, Dodgers Angles) to continue with these exciting mid-summer matchups that seem to draw a larger number of fans.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t understand why you are against even limited instant replay in baseball which would allow plays to be reviewed to get calls right.  A fast review for plays like that foul ball call in the Angles Yankees series just seems to make to much sense.  How long would that really take for an umpire to radio down to the crew on the field and reverse that wrong call?</p>
<p>Finally, I don&#8217;t see the problem of having division and the rivalries created by divisional play (i.e. Mets Braves, Giants Dodgers, Cubs Cardinals).  This is also a way to limit travel for the teams as they play a large number of road games closer to home within their division. </p>
<p>As for the All-Star game I completely agree.  That game does not need to &#8220;mean something&#8221;.  It should be for the fans, which is why it was created in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-48523</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-48523</guid>
		<description>Wow it&#039;s a good thing you&#039;re not commissioner. 

Your point against interleague is legit but an easy way to fix that problem is make sure that teams in each division play the same interleague opponents the same number of times.  That would be an easy fix to interleague play that would still allow teams with legit interleague rivals (ie. A&#039;s Giants, Dodgers Angles) to continue with these exciting mid-summer matchups that seem to draw a larger number of fans.  

Don&#039;t understand why you are against even limited instant replay in baseball which would allow plays to be reviewed to get calls right.  A fast review for plays like that foul ball call in the Angles Yankees series just seems to make to much sense.  How long would that really take for an umpire to radio down to the crew on the field and reverse that wrong call?

Finally, I don&#039;t see the problem of having division and the rivalries created by divisional play (i.e. Mets Braves, Giants Dodgers, Cubs Cardinals).  This is also a way to limit travel for the teams as they play a large number of road games closer to home within their division. 

As for the All-Star game I completely agree.  That game does not need to &quot;mean something&quot;.  It should be for the fans, which is why it was created in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow it&#8217;s a good thing you&#8217;re not commissioner. </p>
<p>Your point against interleague is legit but an easy way to fix that problem is make sure that teams in each division play the same interleague opponents the same number of times.  That would be an easy fix to interleague play that would still allow teams with legit interleague rivals (ie. A&#8217;s Giants, Dodgers Angles) to continue with these exciting mid-summer matchups that seem to draw a larger number of fans.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t understand why you are against even limited instant replay in baseball which would allow plays to be reviewed to get calls right.  A fast review for plays like that foul ball call in the Angles Yankees series just seems to make to much sense.  How long would that really take for an umpire to radio down to the crew on the field and reverse that wrong call?</p>
<p>Finally, I don&#8217;t see the problem of having division and the rivalries created by divisional play (i.e. Mets Braves, Giants Dodgers, Cubs Cardinals).  This is also a way to limit travel for the teams as they play a large number of road games closer to home within their division. </p>
<p>As for the All-Star game I completely agree.  That game does not need to &#8220;mean something&#8221;.  It should be for the fans, which is why it was created in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico_Palazzo_</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-40405</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico_Palazzo_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-40405</guid>
		<description>Wow, I had no idea someone so young could be so backwards thinking.  I thought that was saved for old, crotchety columnists who think the internet is a blight upon our civilization and should be irradicated.  To address your ideas:
1. When would the Atlanta fan get to see Jeter or A-rod play or CC pitch, and when would the Indian fan get to see Pujols play in person?  Not everyone can afford to travel out of town to see these great players play.  Interleague play affords that.  In addition, the attendence and ratings for interleague games is always higher than if the Indians or Royals would be playing each other or the Orioles.  It&#039;s a money maker, and thus, won&#039;t go away.

2. 15 team leagues don&#039;t work if interleague play isn&#039;t instituted.  Scheduling would become a nightmare with teams with 4-5 day stretches off.  The Brewers are fine in the NL.  If you get rid of the divisions you can have entire regions (like the midwest in 04 when the division winner was 83-79) not watching baseball.  Divisions allow for more exciting play, and thus keep fans interested longer.

I agree with you on 3 and 4

5. You&#039;ve seen how terrible calls that are missed reflect on the game.  Replay can go really quick since there already are 4-6 cameras filming the game.  This gives you plenty of angles, and can be done quickly IF the final call belongs to a replay official in the booth and can communicate quickly (perhaps throught these magical new piece of 70 year old technology called walky-talkies) to the crew chief on the field.  As long as there is a finite amount of challenges in the early innings and official&#039;s challenge in the late (similar to the NFL) and a specific list of calls that can be challenged (fair of foul, homer or not, and out or safe at a base), then it can be a very good working solution.

It seems your early argument has to do with game pace.  It would speed up the game a ton if you limit the amount of times Jorge Posada can go speak to a pitcher during an inning (he made 13 trips one time, delaying an inning a good 5 mins).  

The human element is not what makes this game great.  If a call is wrong, then it can ruin a fan&#039;s experience, which should be on the main consideration since it is the fans that produce the majority of revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I had no idea someone so young could be so backwards thinking.  I thought that was saved for old, crotchety columnists who think the internet is a blight upon our civilization and should be irradicated.  To address your ideas:<br />
1. When would the Atlanta fan get to see Jeter or A-rod play or CC pitch, and when would the Indian fan get to see Pujols play in person?  Not everyone can afford to travel out of town to see these great players play.  Interleague play affords that.  In addition, the attendence and ratings for interleague games is always higher than if the Indians or Royals would be playing each other or the Orioles.  It&#8217;s a money maker, and thus, won&#8217;t go away.</p>
<p>2. 15 team leagues don&#8217;t work if interleague play isn&#8217;t instituted.  Scheduling would become a nightmare with teams with 4-5 day stretches off.  The Brewers are fine in the NL.  If you get rid of the divisions you can have entire regions (like the midwest in 04 when the division winner was 83-79) not watching baseball.  Divisions allow for more exciting play, and thus keep fans interested longer.</p>
<p>I agree with you on 3 and 4</p>
<p>5. You&#8217;ve seen how terrible calls that are missed reflect on the game.  Replay can go really quick since there already are 4-6 cameras filming the game.  This gives you plenty of angles, and can be done quickly IF the final call belongs to a replay official in the booth and can communicate quickly (perhaps throught these magical new piece of 70 year old technology called walky-talkies) to the crew chief on the field.  As long as there is a finite amount of challenges in the early innings and official&#8217;s challenge in the late (similar to the NFL) and a specific list of calls that can be challenged (fair of foul, homer or not, and out or safe at a base), then it can be a very good working solution.</p>
<p>It seems your early argument has to do with game pace.  It would speed up the game a ton if you limit the amount of times Jorge Posada can go speak to a pitcher during an inning (he made 13 trips one time, delaying an inning a good 5 mins).  </p>
<p>The human element is not what makes this game great.  If a call is wrong, then it can ruin a fan&#8217;s experience, which should be on the main consideration since it is the fans that produce the majority of revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico_Palazzo_</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-48520</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico_Palazzo_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-48520</guid>
		<description>Wow, I had no idea someone so young could be so backwards thinking.  I thought that was saved for old, crotchety columnists who think the internet is a blight upon our civilization and should be irradicated.  To address your ideas:
1. When would the Atlanta fan get to see Jeter or A-rod play or CC pitch, and when would the Indian fan get to see Pujols play in person?  Not everyone can afford to travel out of town to see these great players play.  Interleague play affords that.  In addition, the attendence and ratings for interleague games is always higher than if the Indians or Royals would be playing each other or the Orioles.  It&#039;s a money maker, and thus, won&#039;t go away.

2. 15 team leagues don&#039;t work if interleague play isn&#039;t instituted.  Scheduling would become a nightmare with teams with 4-5 day stretches off.  The Brewers are fine in the NL.  If you get rid of the divisions you can have entire regions (like the midwest in 04 when the division winner was 83-79) not watching baseball.  Divisions allow for more exciting play, and thus keep fans interested longer.

I agree with you on 3 and 4

5. You&#039;ve seen how terrible calls that are missed reflect on the game.  Replay can go really quick since there already are 4-6 cameras filming the game.  This gives you plenty of angles, and can be done quickly IF the final call belongs to a replay official in the booth and can communicate quickly (perhaps throught these magical new piece of 70 year old technology called walky-talkies) to the crew chief on the field.  As long as there is a finite amount of challenges in the early innings and official&#039;s challenge in the late (similar to the NFL) and a specific list of calls that can be challenged (fair of foul, homer or not, and out or safe at a base), then it can be a very good working solution.

It seems your early argument has to do with game pace.  It would speed up the game a ton if you limit the amount of times Jorge Posada can go speak to a pitcher during an inning (he made 13 trips one time, delaying an inning a good 5 mins).  

The human element is not what makes this game great.  If a call is wrong, then it can ruin a fan&#039;s experience, which should be on the main consideration since it is the fans that produce the majority of revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I had no idea someone so young could be so backwards thinking.  I thought that was saved for old, crotchety columnists who think the internet is a blight upon our civilization and should be irradicated.  To address your ideas:<br />
1. When would the Atlanta fan get to see Jeter or A-rod play or CC pitch, and when would the Indian fan get to see Pujols play in person?  Not everyone can afford to travel out of town to see these great players play.  Interleague play affords that.  In addition, the attendence and ratings for interleague games is always higher than if the Indians or Royals would be playing each other or the Orioles.  It&#8217;s a money maker, and thus, won&#8217;t go away.</p>
<p>2. 15 team leagues don&#8217;t work if interleague play isn&#8217;t instituted.  Scheduling would become a nightmare with teams with 4-5 day stretches off.  The Brewers are fine in the NL.  If you get rid of the divisions you can have entire regions (like the midwest in 04 when the division winner was 83-79) not watching baseball.  Divisions allow for more exciting play, and thus keep fans interested longer.</p>
<p>I agree with you on 3 and 4</p>
<p>5. You&#8217;ve seen how terrible calls that are missed reflect on the game.  Replay can go really quick since there already are 4-6 cameras filming the game.  This gives you plenty of angles, and can be done quickly IF the final call belongs to a replay official in the booth and can communicate quickly (perhaps throught these magical new piece of 70 year old technology called walky-talkies) to the crew chief on the field.  As long as there is a finite amount of challenges in the early innings and official&#8217;s challenge in the late (similar to the NFL) and a specific list of calls that can be challenged (fair of foul, homer or not, and out or safe at a base), then it can be a very good working solution.</p>
<p>It seems your early argument has to do with game pace.  It would speed up the game a ton if you limit the amount of times Jorge Posada can go speak to a pitcher during an inning (he made 13 trips one time, delaying an inning a good 5 mins).  </p>
<p>The human element is not what makes this game great.  If a call is wrong, then it can ruin a fan&#8217;s experience, which should be on the main consideration since it is the fans that produce the majority of revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico_Palazzo_</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-48521</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico_Palazzo_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-48521</guid>
		<description>Wow, I had no idea someone so young could be so backwards thinking.  I thought that was saved for old, crotchety columnists who think the internet is a blight upon our civilization and should be irradicated.  To address your ideas:
1. When would the Atlanta fan get to see Jeter or A-rod play or CC pitch, and when would the Indian fan get to see Pujols play in person?  Not everyone can afford to travel out of town to see these great players play.  Interleague play affords that.  In addition, the attendence and ratings for interleague games is always higher than if the Indians or Royals would be playing each other or the Orioles.  It&#039;s a money maker, and thus, won&#039;t go away.

2. 15 team leagues don&#039;t work if interleague play isn&#039;t instituted.  Scheduling would become a nightmare with teams with 4-5 day stretches off.  The Brewers are fine in the NL.  If you get rid of the divisions you can have entire regions (like the midwest in 04 when the division winner was 83-79) not watching baseball.  Divisions allow for more exciting play, and thus keep fans interested longer.

I agree with you on 3 and 4

5. You&#039;ve seen how terrible calls that are missed reflect on the game.  Replay can go really quick since there already are 4-6 cameras filming the game.  This gives you plenty of angles, and can be done quickly IF the final call belongs to a replay official in the booth and can communicate quickly (perhaps throught these magical new piece of 70 year old technology called walky-talkies) to the crew chief on the field.  As long as there is a finite amount of challenges in the early innings and official&#039;s challenge in the late (similar to the NFL) and a specific list of calls that can be challenged (fair of foul, homer or not, and out or safe at a base), then it can be a very good working solution.

It seems your early argument has to do with game pace.  It would speed up the game a ton if you limit the amount of times Jorge Posada can go speak to a pitcher during an inning (he made 13 trips one time, delaying an inning a good 5 mins).  

The human element is not what makes this game great.  If a call is wrong, then it can ruin a fan&#039;s experience, which should be on the main consideration since it is the fans that produce the majority of revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I had no idea someone so young could be so backwards thinking.  I thought that was saved for old, crotchety columnists who think the internet is a blight upon our civilization and should be irradicated.  To address your ideas:<br />
1. When would the Atlanta fan get to see Jeter or A-rod play or CC pitch, and when would the Indian fan get to see Pujols play in person?  Not everyone can afford to travel out of town to see these great players play.  Interleague play affords that.  In addition, the attendence and ratings for interleague games is always higher than if the Indians or Royals would be playing each other or the Orioles.  It&#8217;s a money maker, and thus, won&#8217;t go away.</p>
<p>2. 15 team leagues don&#8217;t work if interleague play isn&#8217;t instituted.  Scheduling would become a nightmare with teams with 4-5 day stretches off.  The Brewers are fine in the NL.  If you get rid of the divisions you can have entire regions (like the midwest in 04 when the division winner was 83-79) not watching baseball.  Divisions allow for more exciting play, and thus keep fans interested longer.</p>
<p>I agree with you on 3 and 4</p>
<p>5. You&#8217;ve seen how terrible calls that are missed reflect on the game.  Replay can go really quick since there already are 4-6 cameras filming the game.  This gives you plenty of angles, and can be done quickly IF the final call belongs to a replay official in the booth and can communicate quickly (perhaps throught these magical new piece of 70 year old technology called walky-talkies) to the crew chief on the field.  As long as there is a finite amount of challenges in the early innings and official&#8217;s challenge in the late (similar to the NFL) and a specific list of calls that can be challenged (fair of foul, homer or not, and out or safe at a base), then it can be a very good working solution.</p>
<p>It seems your early argument has to do with game pace.  It would speed up the game a ton if you limit the amount of times Jorge Posada can go speak to a pitcher during an inning (he made 13 trips one time, delaying an inning a good 5 mins).  </p>
<p>The human element is not what makes this game great.  If a call is wrong, then it can ruin a fan&#8217;s experience, which should be on the main consideration since it is the fans that produce the majority of revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wunderkill</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-40394</link>
		<dc:creator>Wunderkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-40394</guid>
		<description>good stuff----but trouble with two 15-team leagues is that an interleague game would have to be played every day of the season in order for all teams to be in action on given days----The MLB loves the 15 game Fridays and Saturdays-i think a decent proposal would be to add two teams and get to the NFL standard of 32.  Maybe a Portland, Oregon or Vegas team to even out the west, and a Nashville, Charlotte or New Orleans team to add to the gulf or southern region.  Then rework the league into four 7 team divisions and have division winners (4) and four wildcards (2 per league) round out the playoff field.  
Charlotte Dragons and Las Vegas Silver Sox anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good stuff&#8212;-but trouble with two 15-team leagues is that an interleague game would have to be played every day of the season in order for all teams to be in action on given days&#8212;-The MLB loves the 15 game Fridays and Saturdays-i think a decent proposal would be to add two teams and get to the NFL standard of 32.  Maybe a Portland, Oregon or Vegas team to even out the west, and a Nashville, Charlotte or New Orleans team to add to the gulf or southern region.  Then rework the league into four 7 team divisions and have division winners (4) and four wildcards (2 per league) round out the playoff field.<br />
Charlotte Dragons and Las Vegas Silver Sox anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wunderkill</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-48518</link>
		<dc:creator>Wunderkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-48518</guid>
		<description>good stuff----but trouble with two 15-team leagues is that an interleague game would have to be played every day of the season in order for all teams to be in action on given days----The MLB loves the 15 game Fridays and Saturdays-i think a decent proposal would be to add two teams and get to the NFL standard of 32.  Maybe a Portland, Oregon or Vegas team to even out the west, and a Nashville, Charlotte or New Orleans team to add to the gulf or southern region.  Then rework the league into four 7 team divisions and have division winners (4) and four wildcards (2 per league) round out the playoff field.  
Charlotte Dragons and Las Vegas Silver Sox anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good stuff&#8212;-but trouble with two 15-team leagues is that an interleague game would have to be played every day of the season in order for all teams to be in action on given days&#8212;-The MLB loves the 15 game Fridays and Saturdays-i think a decent proposal would be to add two teams and get to the NFL standard of 32.  Maybe a Portland, Oregon or Vegas team to even out the west, and a Nashville, Charlotte or New Orleans team to add to the gulf or southern region.  Then rework the league into four 7 team divisions and have division winners (4) and four wildcards (2 per league) round out the playoff field.<br />
Charlotte Dragons and Las Vegas Silver Sox anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wunderkill</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2009/11/04/commish-for-a-day/comment-page-1/#comment-48519</link>
		<dc:creator>Wunderkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/?p=17475#comment-48519</guid>
		<description>good stuff----but trouble with two 15-team leagues is that an interleague game would have to be played every day of the season in order for all teams to be in action on given days----The MLB loves the 15 game Fridays and Saturdays-i think a decent proposal would be to add two teams and get to the NFL standard of 32.  Maybe a Portland, Oregon or Vegas team to even out the west, and a Nashville, Charlotte or New Orleans team to add to the gulf or southern region.  Then rework the league into four 7 team divisions and have division winners (4) and four wildcards (2 per league) round out the playoff field.  
Charlotte Dragons and Las Vegas Silver Sox anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good stuff&#8212;-but trouble with two 15-team leagues is that an interleague game would have to be played every day of the season in order for all teams to be in action on given days&#8212;-The MLB loves the 15 game Fridays and Saturdays-i think a decent proposal would be to add two teams and get to the NFL standard of 32.  Maybe a Portland, Oregon or Vegas team to even out the west, and a Nashville, Charlotte or New Orleans team to add to the gulf or southern region.  Then rework the league into four 7 team divisions and have division winners (4) and four wildcards (2 per league) round out the playoff field.<br />
Charlotte Dragons and Las Vegas Silver Sox anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

