Obama’s Vietnam?
.jpg)
Everything, it seems, is starting to go Barack Obama’s way.
He won the Nobel Peace Prize. A health care bill passed the Senate Finance Committee with a guise of bipartisanship. Translation: moderate Republican senator Olympia Snowe voted for it. His poll numbers, after ceaselessly dropping throughout the summer, have steadied, becoming firmly entrenched at around 55 percent approval.
But underneath the calm surface lies potential calamity.
It’s no secret that Afghanistan has worsened since Obama entered office. With another two months left in 2009, the United States has already seen more casualties than any previous year that we’ve been there. The 34,000 troops Obama has sent to the region during his tenure have yet to make any substantial progress that the administration can hang their collective hat on.
And now, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, Obama’s hand-picked general for the Afghanistan conflict, is proposing that the Democratic president send 40,000 more troops to the war torn area.
Obama, his critics say, has dithered while troops continue to struggle. Even McChrystal has said that if Obama doesn’t heed his request, the region will become “Chaos-istan.”
The president has dug himself into a hole that even he, with all his political brilliance, may not be able to get himself out of.
And what’s the first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole? Stop digging.
It is expected that President Obama will take a middle-of-the-road approach, sending between 10,000 and 20,000 troops. But, while being politically viable in the short-term, this move may destroy his presidency.
Allow me to explain. If Obama follows this course of action, we will not win this war. We are fighting a people that neither Alexander the Great nor the Soviet Empire could conquer. And we still think we can win there? The Greeks would have called this hubris.
The president needs to pick a side. He either needs to go all out and try to win this war by doing whatever his generals propose (the George “Dubya” Bush strategy) or declare victory and begin to decrease troop levels until we eventually leave the country (the Nixon strategy). If he does neither, Afghanistan, and I say this with all sincerity, will become another Vietnam (and Obama another Lyndon B. Johnson).
The American people are already beginning to turn against this war. According to a recent Gallup poll, 45 percent of Americans (and 59 percent of Democrats) oppose more troops in Afghanistan. While not a majority, or even a plurality, of the American people, it is a sizable number. The president must decide where he stands on this issue and let the chips fall where they may.
The president thinks his plate is full. It’s only full because in the buffet line he piled on food upon food because the sign said, “All You Can Eat for $10.99.”
Health care will not drastically change the direction of this country. The recession, while important, will not shake us — we already lived through a Great Depression. The potential repeal of our military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy will affect hardly any lives.
These are all side courses, hors d’oeuvres if we stay on the plate analogy. Obama’s decision on Afghanistan is the main course. And he hasn’t even touched it yet.
Related Content
A verified e-mail address is required to post a comment.
Views expressed in the comments section are not representative of The Collegian unless so specified. Comments must be approved by a moderator before they are published. Comments that are inflammatory, profane, libelous and/or posted under a false name may be removed at the discretion of The Collegian. Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper. Be sure to pick up next Friday's issue of The Collegian for featured comments.
2 Responses to Obama’s Vietnam?
Leave a Reply
Connect with us »
Recent Posts »
- Conference USA and Mountain West to form new conference
- Legalizing same-sex marriage gets step closer
- Eighth-inning comeback vaults ‘Dogs past alumni
- Daughter of iconic Mexican painter, muralist visits campus
- Fun ideas on a budget for that special someone on Valentine’s Day
- Notes & Asides, 2/13/12
- Fast Forward [comic]
- Fresno State Softball vs. University of Toledo Rockets [video]
- ASI prepares recommendations for Task Force
- Bulldogs run north
- Campaign to help premature babies asks for students help
- Researchers seek alternative to ozone depleting pesticide; collaboration key to success










I don’t see the author’s logic:
“Health care will not drastically change the direction of this country” but Afghanistan will?
Did our invasion of Iraq in 2003 drastically change the direction of this country? No, not much is different, except the economy, since then.
My only point is simply this: domestic issues should take precedence over Afghanistan because they affect a greater percentage of the population.
I don’t see the author’s logic:
“Health care will not drastically change the direction of this country” but Afghanistan will?
Did our invasion of Iraq in 2003 drastically change the direction of this country? No, not much is different, except the economy, since then.
My only point is simply this: domestic issues should take precedence over Afghanistan because they affect a greater percentage of the population.