Movie review
TriStar Pictures / McClatchy Tribune
“District 9” offers more than the usual sci-fi flick
In “District 9″ the formula is perfect for a textbook alien invasion movie: a spaceship camps out above Johannesburg, South Africa and terror ensues.
The difference here — the aliens are not the bad guys.
Produced by Peter Jackson of “Lord of the Rings” fame, “District 9” begins as a would-be documentary and shifts gears to a more stylized science fiction film.
At the start of the movie we learn the spaceship did not embark on Johannesburg by choice, but stalled above South Africa more than two decades ago, transporting millions of malnourished aliens with no place to call home.
Multi-National United (MNU), a private-interest group, is tasked with moving the aliens from their refugee camp (District 9) to a new location outside of the city.
Mild-mannered Wikus Van Der Merwe, played brilliantly by relatively unknown actor Sharlto Copley, is leading the move.
Director Neill Blomkamp, who co-wrote the screenplay, does a fantastic job of creating an authentically gritty environment complete with dirty politics, back-alley gangs and alien/human prostitution.
One of the film’s biggest strengths is its depiction of the aliens, or “prawns,” as they are insultingly called. Unlike other movies of the genre, the aesthetics of the creatures prove to be both unique and realistic — a cross between a machine and a crustacean.
As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that MNU is more interested in the aliens’ weaponry than their well-being. Appalling experiments are covertly done on the creatures in an effort to unleash the secret to operating their artillery.
The real threat throughout the movie is not the aliens, but the human beings living among them. The lengths to which MNU’s top officials are willing to go for financial gain are by far the most menacing part of the film.
“District 9” challenges the science fiction genre by questioning who the real enemy is. It is a suspenseful, yet intelligent film worth checking out.
Related Content
A verified e-mail address is required to post a comment.
Views expressed in the comments section are not representative of The Collegian unless so specified. Comments must be approved by a moderator before they are published. Comments that are inflammatory, profane, libelous and/or posted under a false name may be removed at the discretion of The Collegian. Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper. Be sure to pick up next Friday's issue of The Collegian for featured comments.
16 Responses to Movie review
Leave a Reply
Connect with us »
Recent Posts »
- Fresno State Softball vs. University of Toledo Rockets [video]
- ASI prepares recommendations for Task Force
- Bulldogs run north
- Campaign to help premature babies asks for students help
- Researchers seek alternative to ozone depleting pesticide; collaboration key to success
- Jimmy Collier: activist, musician
- Last meeting held before Provost’s decision on Feb. 16
- Back Country Film Festival visits Fresno State 2012
- Save Mart Center parking clarity questioned
- Greeks combat crime in ‘Sin City’
- Super Bowl had campus connection
- ‘Dogs mentally prepared for final WAC road trip
This is a very well written review. It makes me want to run out and see the movie.
This is a very well written review. It makes me want to run out and see the movie.
Angelica Cano really knows what she is writing about.
Angelica Cano really knows what she is writing about.
garbage film
garbage film
cheers!
cheers!
While I wouldn’t quite call it a garbage film, I don’t think District 9 is a good movie. It’s not horrible, but it’s no more than OK. In my opinion it comes across as a clumsy allegory on apartheid, full of cliches and comic-book pseudoscience, as well as overwhelmed by action that fails to advance the plot. Had this been a more stylized movie, these issues could have been overlooked, but as it is presented as a “realistic” pseudo-documantary, it just ends up looking silly.
While I wouldn’t quite call it a garbage film, I don’t think District 9 is a good movie. It’s not horrible, but it’s no more than OK. In my opinion it comes across as a clumsy allegory on apartheid, full of cliches and comic-book pseudoscience, as well as overwhelmed by action that fails to advance the plot. Had this been a more stylized movie, these issues could have been overlooked, but as it is presented as a “realistic” pseudo-documantary, it just ends up looking silly.
I love sci-fi and I’m intrigued after reading Angelica’s review – I definitely want to see the film.
I love sci-fi and I’m intrigued after reading Angelica’s review – I definitely want to see the film.
I actually thought that this film had quite a few problems, the most evident of which was the fact that the movie never explained why the alien ship came to our planet in the first place, nor why all the intelligent aliens died off, save 1. I thought that the movie also had quite an agenda, the opening monologue being filled with scenes fairly descriptive of the civil rights movement of last century in America. Other than that though, I agree with your review, and very well written, besides. You cover a lot of good points.
I actually thought that this film had quite a few problems, the most evident of which was the fact that the movie never explained why the alien ship came to our planet in the first place, nor why all the intelligent aliens died off, save 1. I thought that the movie also had quite an agenda, the opening monologue being filled with scenes fairly descriptive of the civil rights movement of last century in America. Other than that though, I agree with your review, and very well written, besides. You cover a lot of good points.
This is yet another demonstration of Spain’s enduring commitment to the values and the mission of the United Nations. ,
This is yet another demonstration of Spain’s enduring commitment to the values and the mission of the United Nations. ,