<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for L.U.V.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/</link>
	<description>Serving California State University, Fresno since 1922.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Billings</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/comment-page-1/#comment-27306</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/#comment-27306</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Collegian Staff Comment&lt;/i&gt;

The related articles are generated from keywords that are found in both articles.  Usually this works pretty well, but sometimes the articles are only nominally related.  It&#039;s just the &quot;nature of the beast,&quot; as it were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Collegian Staff Comment</i></p>
<p>The related articles are generated from keywords that are found in both articles.  Usually this works pretty well, but sometimes the articles are only nominally related.  It&#8217;s just the &#8220;nature of the beast,&#8221; as it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Billings</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/comment-page-1/#comment-44405</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/#comment-44405</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Collegian Staff Comment&lt;/i&gt;

The related articles are generated from keywords that are found in both articles.  Usually this works pretty well, but sometimes the articles are only nominally related.  It&#039;s just the &quot;nature of the beast,&quot; as it were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Collegian Staff Comment</i></p>
<p>The related articles are generated from keywords that are found in both articles.  Usually this works pretty well, but sometimes the articles are only nominally related.  It&#8217;s just the &#8220;nature of the beast,&#8221; as it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles W. Frank</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/comment-page-1/#comment-27302</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles W. Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/#comment-27302</guid>
		<description>This actually sounds like an interesting program ... a little bit off of the beaten path, and good to see something of the sort is getting some degree of attention ... how about giving it a little more attention and trying to promote attendance ... cause I&#039;m sick of hearing &quot;buzz&quot; about &quot;Brad&quot; and &quot;Oscar.&quot;

Why was this associated (&quot;Related Articles&quot;) with the &quot;Utopian Society&quot; article (which in itself is an unrealistic / idealist elaboration on something that wouldn&#039;t and won&#039;t happen)?  Face it: facts - Utopian society, the closer you get, the further away it is, like any ideal.  Work hard only to work harder (not a bad plan in itself, but comes too close to communism and socialism).

This article appears to be as much a marketing gimmick for the Wellness Challenge as it is for LUV.

On the flip-side, sounds like another reason / excuse for people to go somewhere and whine about something they can&#039;t do much about until they learn to help themselves.

Boost confidence and self esteem?  I hardly see how that&#039;s possible.  Is it group therapy for people who have beaten down personalities?  Make friends by going to a group?  Isn&#039;t this a bit contrary to concepts behind loners being exactly who they are for a reason (ref: 16 personality types).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This actually sounds like an interesting program &#8230; a little bit off of the beaten path, and good to see something of the sort is getting some degree of attention &#8230; how about giving it a little more attention and trying to promote attendance &#8230; cause I&#8217;m sick of hearing &#8220;buzz&#8221; about &#8220;Brad&#8221; and &#8220;Oscar.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why was this associated (&#8220;Related Articles&#8221;) with the &#8220;Utopian Society&#8221; article (which in itself is an unrealistic / idealist elaboration on something that wouldn&#8217;t and won&#8217;t happen)?  Face it: facts &#8211; Utopian society, the closer you get, the further away it is, like any ideal.  Work hard only to work harder (not a bad plan in itself, but comes too close to communism and socialism).</p>
<p>This article appears to be as much a marketing gimmick for the Wellness Challenge as it is for LUV.</p>
<p>On the flip-side, sounds like another reason / excuse for people to go somewhere and whine about something they can&#8217;t do much about until they learn to help themselves.</p>
<p>Boost confidence and self esteem?  I hardly see how that&#8217;s possible.  Is it group therapy for people who have beaten down personalities?  Make friends by going to a group?  Isn&#8217;t this a bit contrary to concepts behind loners being exactly who they are for a reason (ref: 16 personality types).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles W. Frank</title>
		<link>http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/comment-page-1/#comment-44404</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles W. Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2008/02/25/looking-for-luv/#comment-44404</guid>
		<description>This actually sounds like an interesting program ... a little bit off of the beaten path, and good to see something of the sort is getting some degree of attention ... how about giving it a little more attention and trying to promote attendance ... cause I&#039;m sick of hearing &quot;buzz&quot; about &quot;Brad&quot; and &quot;Oscar.&quot;

Why was this associated (&quot;Related Articles&quot;) with the &quot;Utopian Society&quot; article (which in itself is an unrealistic / idealist elaboration on something that wouldn&#039;t and won&#039;t happen)?  Face it: facts - Utopian society, the closer you get, the further away it is, like any ideal.  Work hard only to work harder (not a bad plan in itself, but comes too close to communism and socialism).

This article appears to be as much a marketing gimmick for the Wellness Challenge as it is for LUV.

On the flip-side, sounds like another reason / excuse for people to go somewhere and whine about something they can&#039;t do much about until they learn to help themselves.

Boost confidence and self esteem?  I hardly see how that&#039;s possible.  Is it group therapy for people who have beaten down personalities?  Make friends by going to a group?  Isn&#039;t this a bit contrary to concepts behind loners being exactly who they are for a reason (ref: 16 personality types).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This actually sounds like an interesting program &#8230; a little bit off of the beaten path, and good to see something of the sort is getting some degree of attention &#8230; how about giving it a little more attention and trying to promote attendance &#8230; cause I&#8217;m sick of hearing &#8220;buzz&#8221; about &#8220;Brad&#8221; and &#8220;Oscar.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why was this associated (&#8220;Related Articles&#8221;) with the &#8220;Utopian Society&#8221; article (which in itself is an unrealistic / idealist elaboration on something that wouldn&#8217;t and won&#8217;t happen)?  Face it: facts &#8211; Utopian society, the closer you get, the further away it is, like any ideal.  Work hard only to work harder (not a bad plan in itself, but comes too close to communism and socialism).</p>
<p>This article appears to be as much a marketing gimmick for the Wellness Challenge as it is for LUV.</p>
<p>On the flip-side, sounds like another reason / excuse for people to go somewhere and whine about something they can&#8217;t do much about until they learn to help themselves.</p>
<p>Boost confidence and self esteem?  I hardly see how that&#8217;s possible.  Is it group therapy for people who have beaten down personalities?  Make friends by going to a group?  Isn&#8217;t this a bit contrary to concepts behind loners being exactly who they are for a reason (ref: 16 personality types).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

