He doesn’t believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Take a look at this, though.

Whatever you think about my personal politics, the rating was on sleaze — Ron Paul’s the integrity vote, so he couldn’t rate any higher on the sleaze-o-meter than he did.

Oh, and by the way? I’m a registered Democrat.

He doesn’t believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Take a look at this, though.

Whatever you think about my personal politics, the rating was on sleaze — Ron Paul’s the integrity vote, so he couldn’t rate any higher on the sleaze-o-meter than he did.

Oh, and by the way? I’m a registered Democrat.

That article was like the Arizon Cardinals…weak sauce!!
Though you did fit the collegian template an motto: SHORT on deatails, long on simplification.

Ron Paul….really, honestly, you want to conclude the article with a Dr. Paul recommendation? Hey Baxter, do you belive (as Paul does) that 9/11 was an inside job? Let me rephrase that for you….do you think the current president planned to kill over 3000 Americans by crashing two jets into the twin towers? Paul belives that, do you?

Fortunately only about 5 of us read this paper……

Have a grat day
Si se puedes
and go DogS

That article was like the Arizon Cardinals…weak sauce!!
Though you did fit the collegian template an motto: SHORT on deatails, long on simplification.

Ron Paul….really, honestly, you want to conclude the article with a Dr. Paul recommendation? Hey Baxter, do you belive (as Paul does) that 9/11 was an inside job? Let me rephrase that for you….do you think the current president planned to kill over 3000 Americans by crashing two jets into the twin towers? Paul belives that, do you?

Fortunately only about 5 of us read this paper……

Have a grat day
Si se puedes
and go DogS

Given a choice, I’d rather it not burn.

Given a choice, I’d rather it not burn.

For the most part, I agree.

However, changing opinions for the sake of political opportunism — Romney’s the worst at that — is the sleazy thing to do.

For the most part, I agree.

However, changing opinions for the sake of political opportunism — Romney’s the worst at that — is the sleazy thing to do.

Thomas Jefferson definitely embellished on that one. And James Madison, who wrote of the proposed constitution’s safeguards against factionalism in the Federalist Papers, later became the poster child of factionalism in the republican party.

Switching opinions isn’t necessarily wrong. We all do it. McCain’s been alive a long time!

And who in that situation wouldn’t obscure the record to make himself look better?

But, are Jefferson and Madison sleazes? No way. I think the difference is that they were doing what they believed to be best for the country.

But that was before it was respectable to even campaign. If the people didn’t pick you outright you weren’t worthy.

Politics is a sleazy business and I don’t like any of the presidential candidates.

Thomas Jefferson definitely embellished on that one. And James Madison, who wrote of the proposed constitution’s safeguards against factionalism in the Federalist Papers, later became the poster child of factionalism in the republican party.

Switching opinions isn’t necessarily wrong. We all do it. McCain’s been alive a long time!

And who in that situation wouldn’t obscure the record to make himself look better?

But, are Jefferson and Madison sleazes? No way. I think the difference is that they were doing what they believed to be best for the country.

But that was before it was respectable to even campaign. If the people didn’t pick you outright you weren’t worthy.

Politics is a sleazy business and I don’t like any of the presidential candidates.