advertisement

Vivas case not over yet

By | September 12, 2007 | News (2)

This summer, former Fresno State women’s volleyball coach Lindy Vivas won $5.85 million in a gender discrimination suit against the university, a verdict the school has since appealed.

Meanwhile, CSU Chancellor Charles B. Reed criticized the award and continues to stand behind University President John D. Welty, saying he felt the jury “was essentially trying to punish the CSU.”

Vivas’ coaching contract was not renewed in 2004, and she filed a discrimination suit against Fresno State in February 2006. In the suit, Vivas asked for $4.1 million for lost wages and damages. The university offered to settle for $15,000.

Vivas, 50, began her coaching career at Fresno State in 1990. In 2002, her team saw its best season in school history, with a record of 23-7.

She claimed the university discriminated against her because of her perceived sexual orientation and because she advocated equal treatment for female athletes and access to the campus’ facilities.

However, university officials said Vivas was let go because she didn’t meet performance goals by not winning enough post-season games and failing to draw large crowds to the matches. When the university’s then-athletic director Scott Johnson announced Vivas’ dismissal in 2004, Johnson also said her team’s inability to finish in the top 25 for more than a decade was another reason for not renewing her contract.

Vivas’ civil trial began in June in the Fresno County Superior Court. Several key players testified in the case, including former Fresno State women’s basketball coach Stacy Johnson-Klein and Welty’s wife, Sharon Brown-Welty.

According to Vivas’ testimony, Johnson and other top athletics officials allegedly participated in “Ugly Women Athletes Day.” She said in April 2000, she walked into a department office and saw a poster that had vulgar cutouts of women’s bodies with male heads.

“I walked in and off to the right was a poster that said ugly woman athletes…I couldn’t believe it was still continuing,” Vivas testified. “I thought, when was this going to end.”

Johnson-Klein was expected to testify and support Vivas’ case, but the university’s attorney attempted to discredit the former basketball coach’s testimony.

During Brown-Welty’s testimony, she discussed an October 2004 conversation with Johnson-Klein, saying the former basketball coach “mentioned to me that she was praying daily that Lindy wouldn’t be offered a contract.”

“She had her entire church praying that Lindy would not be offered a contract,” Brown-Welty testified.

The trial lasted 18 days. Deliberations took three days.

The jury rewarded the former volleyball coach $5.85 million on July 9. However, in late August, attorneys for the university filed a motion to the Fresno County Superior Court that it would be seeking a new trial.

The university issued a press release in July, stating that an appeal of the case would be pursued “on a variety of grounds” and that no funds would be paid “until all appeals are exhausted.”

Reed called the Vivas settlement “excessive” at a legislative hearing in late July. Sen. Dean Florez, D-Shafter, requested that Senate leaders create the state Senate Select Committee on Gender Discrimination and Title IX Implementation after the Vivas verdict.

Reed said the CSU system has seen six Title IX cases in the past decade. The 23-campus system won in two of those cases, according to Reed.

Vivas damage award breakdown

The jury divided Vivas’ settlement into the following categories:

• $2,625,000 for past non-economic losses

• $875,000 for future non-economic losses

• $550,000 for past economic losses

• $1,802,069 for future economic losses

Total: $5,852,069

A verified e-mail address is required to post a comment.Views expressed in the comments section are not representative of The Collegian unless so specified. Comments must be approved by a moderator before they are published. Comments that are inflammatory, profane, libellous and/or posted under a false name may be removed at the discretion of The Collegian. Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.

8 Responses to Vivas case not over yet

  1. Buck Swope says:

    That’s a little harsh for a settlement against a public school. It’s not like Fresno State or the Welty team is going to feel the impact of that——-it’s the state taxpayers who will be swindled.

    Still, Dean Florez is grandstanding with his whole little Title IX crusade. Hello—-65% of the varsty athletes here are women.

    Vivas turned the program from one of promise into a very mediocre squad. If I recall, she had a very sorry 2003 & 2004 season.

    5.8 mill? 2.6 for ‘past non-economic loss’? Did she lose her Tiger Woods-esque Nike endorsement deal by getting dismissed from Fresno State? She’s a WAC women’s volleyball coach.

  2. Buck Swope says:

    That’s a little harsh for a settlement against a public school. It’s not like Fresno State or the Welty team is going to feel the impact of that——-it’s the state taxpayers who will be swindled.

    Still, Dean Florez is grandstanding with his whole little Title IX crusade. Hello—-65% of the varsty athletes here are women.

    Vivas turned the program from one of promise into a very mediocre squad. If I recall, she had a very sorry 2003 & 2004 season.

    5.8 mill? 2.6 for ‘past non-economic loss’? Did she lose her Tiger Woods-esque Nike endorsement deal by getting dismissed from Fresno State? She’s a WAC women’s volleyball coach.

  3. Mike Greyson says:

    Mr. Nieves isn’t doing such a fabulous job since his tenure began.

  4. Mike Greyson says:

    Mr. Nieves isn’t doing such a fabulous job since his tenure began.

  5. Would Vivas have accumulated $1,800,000 for the remained of her coaching career?

  6. Would Vivas have accumulated $1,800,000 for the remained of her coaching career?

  7. We also have a Web-Spe@k up on this topic.

  8. We also have a Web-Spe@k up on this topic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

advertisement