Two other discrimination lawsuits pending
After losing $5.85 million this summer to former women’s volleyball coach Lindy Vivas, Fresno State stands to lose even more respect and money thanks to the two high-profile gender discrimination cases scheduled to start in October and November.
Fresno State women’s basketball fans recall head coach Stacy Johnson-Klein, both outspoken and fashionably dressed for her team’s games. But what garnered more attention was her suspension, a three-week internal investigation performed by the university and her eventual termination from Fresno State in 2005.
In the end, the university accused her of repeatedly taking prescription painkillers from a player, mishandling money, not listening to “higher ups,” committing an NCAA violation by allowing a player’s parent to stay in a university-paid hotel room and creating a hostile work and learning environment for her players and the staff.
Johnson-Klein is now suing her former employer for not only wrongful termination, but also sexual harassment and gender discrimination, which Vivas claimed in her winning suit as well.
Johnson-Klein’s case will begin sometime in October. Following that in November will be the suit filed by former Associate Athletics Director Diane Milutinovich.
Milutinovich, who worked for 21 years as an athletic administrator at Fresno State and as the associate athletics director for the last 12 years of her tenure, was fired from her high ranking position in 2002 and reassigned just last year as the director of the University Student Union.
Fresno State claims she was taken out of the athletics department due to budgetary reasons.
Milutinovich disagrees saying she was removed from the athletics department because of her role in previous Title IX incidents involving Fresno State, including a 1992 suit that resulted in a two-year investigation by the Office of Civil Rights that found Fresno State out of compliance with Title IX in 11 areas.
According to Milutinovich’s attorney, Dan Siegel, who also represented Vivas, the two cases are very similar.
Related Content
A verified e-mail address is required to post a comment.
Views expressed in the comments section are not representative of The Collegian unless so specified. Comments must be approved by a moderator before they are published. Comments that are inflammatory, profane, libelous and/or posted under a false name may be removed at the discretion of The Collegian. Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper. Be sure to pick up next Friday's issue of The Collegian for featured comments.
6 Responses to Two other discrimination lawsuits pending
Leave a Reply

Connect with us »
Recent Posts »
- Legalizing same-sex marriage gets step closer
- Eighth-inning comeback vaults ‘Dogs past alumni
- Daughter of iconic Mexican painter, muralist visits campus
- Fun ideas on a budget for that special someone on Valentine’s Day
- Notes & Asides, 2/13/12
- Fast Forward [comic]
- Fresno State Softball vs. University of Toledo Rockets [video]
- ASI prepares recommendations for Task Force
- Bulldogs run north
- Campaign to help premature babies asks for students help
- Researchers seek alternative to ozone depleting pesticide; collaboration key to success
- Jimmy Collier: activist, musician










Vivas & Milutinovich probably have valid cases, Stacey Johnson-Klein however is a different story. If you watched the news when she was fired most of her players were rather happy and didnt want her coming back. That kind of shows she was doing something wrong.
Vivas & Milutinovich probably have valid cases, Stacey Johnson-Klein however is a different story. If you watched the news when she was fired most of her players were rather happy and didnt want her coming back. That kind of shows she was doing something wrong.
And don’t forget Stacey’s little pill popping incident.
And don’t forget Stacey’s little pill popping incident.
Yeah, it should be fun to watch Klein’s case flop.
Yeah, it should be fun to watch Klein’s case flop.